General Stanley McChrystal: "My Share of the Task"
Born the son and grandson of Army officers, there was little doubt that Stanley McChrystal would become a soldier. The West Point graduate rose through the ranks to command a special forces team in Iraq, which captured Saddam Hussein and killed top al-Qaida terrorists. In 2009, Gen. McChrystal took command of NATO operations in Afghanistan. But a controversial profile in Rolling Stone magazine the next year suggested he was at odds with the White House, and he resigned. In a new memoir, Gen. McChrystal writes about his military life, the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and why Rolling Stone got it wrong.
Guests
co-founder of the McChrystal Group and former commander of NATO coalition in Afghanistan.
Related Items
Read An Excerpt
Excerpted from "My Share of the Task: A Memoir." Published by Portfolio/ Penguin. Copyright © Stanley McChrystal, 2013.


Comments
Please familiarize yourself with our Code of Conduct and Terms of Use before posting your comments.
Hello Diane
I am aware your show advocates for sweeping anti second amendment laws and I am sure you are aware of General McChrystal's position on the second amendment. Can you please ask the General...
#1 Why he deliberately confuses the military M4 and the M16 both of which are "machine guns" that are not available to the public with the semi automatics that are when he makes his opinions known publicly for more gun regulations? I would assume an army General trained in weaponry would know the difference, I am trying to understand what seems to be a deliberate deception.
#2 The General says the .223 ammunition they use in the military is too powerful for civilian use, please ask him what he thinks of the 308 and 30.06 ammunition that are the favorites of hunters worldwide and are much more powerful than the .223, and also used or has been used by our military, it appears to be more than a coincidence that he is repeating democrat party talking points on so called "assault rifles" a style of weapon statistically rarely used in homicides or crimes in general. The handgun is the murder weapon of choice and typically they use 9mm ammunition. ? (30.06 was replaced by 308 as a NATO requirement)
#3 With the information as he has publicly stated above in the first and second question and as dubious as it appears, please ask the General if he is on a personal crusade or part of a larger political movement to enact more gun regulations on civilians by any deception necessary in order to get a foot in the door for the desired democratic party total gun ban on private gun ownership?
#4 Please ask the General about his oath to uphold the Constitution and the personal conflict he holds as a liberal democrat on the second amendment, and lastly, are there any other Constitutional rights he may wish to diminish, suppress or just feels are irrelevant and can and should be eliminated?
Thank You
It is always quite interesting to see what persona an author presents to each audience he addresses as he does "the book tour".
Will the General show his Comedy Central Daily Show opinions and attitudes?
Or will he show his Fox News side? Or some version of a Sunday morning news show face?
What stance sells the most books?
I predict the rock star persona as in Rolling Stone. (Contrasts sharply with his "retired" status, so he will moosh his personal history into one soggy glob like Keith Richards and go dreamy.)
He can't possibly go NRAzy and recommend the same counterinsurgency at home as used overseas: "Sons of the Confederacy- Here's ten Franklins and a fifth of Jack Daniels, now snuff all the dissidents you can. Trim your yellow toenails, put some Jiff and Wonder Bread in a superhero backpack and meet me at the schoolyard ready to shoot some people."
Since the book starts with Christmas he'll have to limit gun ownership to the Official Red Ryder 200 Shot Range Model Air Rifle with a compass in the stock. He'll make safety glasses mandatory so 2nd Emolument enthusiasts won't "shoot out their eye."
Better stock up on Daisy BBs Ron. WalMart reports China can't make them fast enough.
Ron L, I don't know about Miss Rehm, but for me, your post represents even more reason why I have no problem as a gun owner with full on background checks for gun purchases on all levels. You haven't asked any questions. You've attacked. And not only have you attacked, you've gone straight past obsession, past unnerving and rounding the clinched teeth and fist, sweating bullets (no pun.....on second thought) watch-list the NRA spokesperson said are the ones we should be keeping an eye on. How do ya like that for irony.
It is the General who is attacking. I have not heard his deliberately misguided assertions challenged anywhere at this point. ALL rifle crimes involved in murders are 2.5%, less than clubs and hammers at 3.3%. I am fully aware my questions will not be asked no matter how I word them, however I am certain Diane will ask the General to comment on the gun debate because she knows in advance his well rehearsed views. My comment is a preemptive strike on an anticipated D.R. show propaganda opportunity.
>
X
<
Patrick Henry, in the Virginia ratification convention June 5, 1788, argued for the dual rights to arms and resistance to oppression:
Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are inevitably ruined.
Despite Gen. McChrystal’s much vaunted “candor,” his new memoir, “My Share of the Task,” whitewashes the controversies of his career. For example, he still declines to “confirm or deny” the accuracy of Michael Hasting’s “Rolling Stone” profile which got him fired (McChrystal doesn’t even mention Hastings by name, nor discuss his more detailed 2012 book, “The Operators”).
In addition, McChrystal dodged taking responsibility for his central role in the Army’s cover-up of Pat Tillman’s 2004 friendly-fire death, the routine use of torture by JSOC forces under his command from 2003-2005, and his strategically flawed Afghan War “surge” (for details, see the 150-page post, "Never Shall I Fail My Comrades": The Dark Legacy of Gen. Stanley McChrystal, at the Feral Firefighter blog).
McChrystal’s portrayal of the interrogations that led to the 2006 killing of Abu Zarqawi totally contradicts the accounts of both author Marc Bowden (“The Ploy”) and former interrogator Matthew Alexander (“We found Zarqawi in spite of the way the task force [JSOC TF 145] did business”).
Finally, McChrystal somehow failed to even mention interrogator Eric Maddox who was decorated for his efforts which directly led to the 2003 capture of Saddam Hussein (perhaps because a key detainee died of a “heart attack” shortly after arriving at Camp Nama on November 8, 2003).
General McChrystal, a 2007 Dept. of Defense IG report found you were “accountable for the inaccurate [Silver Star] award recommendation” for Pat Tillman. For example, the report found the two witness statements were altered “somewhere in the [Silver Star] approval chain” (apparently by the Ranger RGT commanding officers). “PFC [O’Neal] stated that he did not sign the valorous award witness statement” and “also pointed out parts he knows he did not write and parts that were not accurate.” “SGT [Ward] pointed out parts that were inaccurate, in that he was unable to see CPL Tillman’s actions from his location” (for details, see the post “Never Shall I Fail My Comrades” in the Feral Firefighter blog).
Kevin Tillman told Congress: “These are deliberate acts of deceit. … To falsify a witness statement in a Silver Star award, fabricating it with these kids’ names on it.” And, Jon Krakauer, in the paperback edition of his book, "Where Men Win Glory," described "how you "administered the medal recommendation process” and directly supervised the Ranger RGT commanding officers who apparently altered the witness statements. He wrote that a false narrative "was painstakingly written to create the impression Pat Tillman was killed by enemy fire” and that “The Silver Star recommendation was "fraudulent" by "any objective measure."
General McChrystal, in your memoir, you wrote that Pat Tillman's Silver Star citation contained “errors,” but that they were “not the result of any intention to misrepresent or mislead.” Could you please explain how “errors” could possibly explain the two forged witness statements in the Silver Star recommendation that you approved?
General McChrystal, in April 2011, President Obama appointed you to oversee the “Joining Forces” program to support military families. In response, Mary Tillman (Pat Tillman's mother) said, “It’s a slap in the face to appoint this man” … “He deliberately helped cover up Pat’s death”…”…someone who has a heartfelt desire to help families would not have been involved in the cover-up of a soldier’s death…”
Former San Francisco Chronicle Editor Narda Zacchino wrote at Truthdig, “It is bewildering and tasteless, after McChrystal’s callous disregard for the Tillman family throughout this entire episode, that Barack Obama should appoint him to a high-profile position having anything to do with helping military families."
General McChrystal, have you ever spoken with Mary Tillman (or other members of the Tillman family) to answer her questions about your handling of her son’s 2004 friendly fire death? If so, what did you say to her?
General McChrystal, you wrote that “some found misleading” the Silver Star citation that you approved for Pat Tillman. The citation reads, “for gallantry in action … against an armed enemy … enemy fire … Cpl. Tillman put himself in the line of devastating enemy fire … known enemy positions … enemy's withdrawal and his platoon's safe passage from the ambush kill zone.”
“Some”? Anyone reading the citation would think Tillman was killed by enemy fire! But, there was no enemy fire, no enemy withdrawal, no ambush kill zone, and no safe passage (besides Tillman, an Afghan soldier was killed, the LT was hit in the face and the RO in the knee). Major Hodne testified he “carefully prepared the narrative to avoid stating that the enemy had killed CPL Tillman” and removed “a phrase asserting that CPL had died ‘by enemy fire.’”
But, even though verbal confirmation of friendly fire by the initial 15-6 investigating officer had been given to you just two days after Tillman’s death (four days before you approved this citation) there is no mention of friendly fire in the citation.
General McChrystal, could you explain just how you somehow managed to overlook these “errors” in the Silver Star citation you approved for Pat Tillman?
This so called 'War on terrorism' is nothing but a lie, not unlike the 'War on drugs'..
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety."
With respect to the Rolling Stone interview, how could Gen. McChrystal not know the outcome when he allowed the journalists to follow his staff? Not to negate his extraordinary service, but again, from the RS interview, how could his staff not be in control and on their best behavior when being followed by journalists? In conjunction with this question, are our top leaders fully aware and in control of what their staff's behavior, actions? Does it relate to the Secret Service incidents?
good morning,
the word that is repeated over and over is "SERVICE". My father's grandfathers were career military men. The only one of my nine uncles who did not serve had had polio. It is the giving back to this great nation of our, SERVICE to our nation that is the reason they served and my brother and my cousins and I served.
scott livesey AT1 USN(ret)
"a bleak new Pentagon report has found that only one of the Afghan National Army’s 23 brigades is able to operate independently without air or other military support from the United States and NATO partners.”
" Will they ever be ready? Maybe not. 1 – Afghanistan is unlikely to ever have enough income to pay for the forces we have created for them. Where will they get their money if not from us? 2 – The apparent disparity between ethnic “nations” in Afghanistan and the composition of the “Afghan” Army is unpromising as a basis for the integrity of the state. …”
I'm interested in knowing if the general has seen the documentary "The Invisible War" and what advice he would give to young women who feel that same call to join the armed services as he did as a young man.
I am disappointed that the General believes that Stonewall Jackson was a hero. Jackson was a traitor to his country and the constitution, fighting to preserve the institution of slavery. Nothing heroic about that. I would suggest that those who died fighting to save the Union and preserve the constitution, as did several of my ancestors - one who died at the Battle of Shiloh - are better examples of bravery and heroicism than that of the
traitor, Stonewall Jackson.
I doubt the good general has read any of this, apparently his life efforts are not much appreciated on many fronts. I'm pretty sure the General lives in a bubble of glad handers and has for a very long time.
There is something very creepy about the over the top reverence all military veterans are given. As if somehow they can all be "hero's" in the real sense of the word.
Americans swear against the Creator Of The Universe everyday without mortal punition. 80% of Americans claim they identify themselves as Christians. Sad for General McChrystal that such penalty is rendered by the government administration and the public-at-large through the media press, when he, in effect, “swears” against his boss, the Commander-in-Chief of the military organization he served. Clearly half of Congress disagree with the President of the United States, yet continue to hold their jobs. All of us have worked for bosses where personal friction has been a difficult problem in our employ. I would conclude that 80% of our country bespeaks Christianity, but don’t really act on that belief. I would like to have seen General McChrystal be allowed to make a public apology to the President in response to the public media article in The Rolling Stone, and be left to hold his responsible military position. The Creator Of The Universe would have approved.
During the interview the General expressed that he wanted to exemplify leadership. When asked about his position on measures to curb gun violence he informed listeners of the devastating firepower that can be delivered by military rifles. He expressed his reservations in allowing easy access to these weapons.
When asked if he would support measures to control access to these weapons he refused to advocate for or against any sort of policy considerations.
Is this the kind of position he thinks will make him a textbook leadership icon and West Point case study?
Mr. McChrystal, you don't make the leadership history books by being indecisive and non-commital. The forgotton graveyards of history are littered with "leaders" who chose to cower in the obfuscation of their convictions.
C