Richard Davidson, Sharon Begley: "The Emotional Life of Your Brain"
Collage created using two overlayed images, one of a cactus, the other of a real MRI of a brain, from the top of the skull
RightBrainPhotography via Flickr: http://www.flickr.com/photos/rightbrainphotography
Neuropsychologist Richard Davidson and science writer Sharon Begley explain how your brain chemistry affects the way you think, feel and live - and whether you can change your emotional style. Many neuroscientists used to believe that thinking and emotions run on separate brain circuitry. But new studies using neuroimaging have challenged conventional notions about the brain's role in emotions. Davidson has identified distinct emotional styles and their connection to patterns of activity throughout the brain. Locating the bases of emotion partly in the brain's seat of reason implies people have a greater ability to change than was once thought. In their new book, Davidson and Begley argue that we can retrain our brains so that we can become more resilient, less negative and, possibly, happier. The science behind emotions.
Guests
senior health and science correspondent,Reuters; author of "Train Your Mind, Change Your Brain"; and the co-author (with Jeffrey Schwartz) of "The Mind and the Brain."
professor of psychology and psychiatry at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Program Highlights
Neuroscientist Richard Davidson has long been fascinated by differing reactions people have to life's up and downs. He set out to learn why some people bounce back from a traumatic event while others are devastated for years, why some have a sunny outlook and others are gloomy. Davidson and his co-author Sharon Begley have written a new book titled "The Emotional Life of Your Brain."
Why Has Brain Research Lagged?
Diane wondered why brain research seems to have lagged so far behind other research. Begley believes that scientists interested in brain study focused on thinking, reasoning and judgment for a long time. Emotions, Begley said, were like the "riff raff" of the brain. "It really was the stepchild for neuroscience research for many, many years," Begley said.
The Role Of Cognitive Therapy In Changing The Way We Think And Behave
Cognitive therapy primarily involves teaching people to think differently about the causes of their behavior, Davidson said. "So if something bad happens, if we're confronted by some adverse event in the environment, rather than attributing that negative thing to ourselves - let's say we don't get a job promotion that we were expecting. Rather than attributing it to some flaw in ourselves and some consistent attribute of our behavior, we learn to reinterpret it and to adopt a larger perspective," Davidson said. Changing thinking like this can be a first step to changing behavior, he said.
What Is "Emotional Style?"
Emotional style refers to how you react to what life throws at you, Begley said. Many people who've had a bad day at the office and come home and take it out on a spouse don't even realize what they're doing, she said. "That is an aspect of self-awareness, being attuned to the emotional
signals that your body sends you," she said. The authors have also identified what they call "sensitivity to context," which refers to modulating your emotional behavior based on the context in which you find yourself. For example, soliders who experience post-traumatic stress
disorder may find themselves having a panic attack upon hearing a siren in their residential neighborhood after they've returned from a war zone. Davidson said this is because they're unable in that moment to calibrate their behavior to this different environment.
Resilience
Begley and Davidson encourage people to look honestly at their own character traits to try to figure out their levels of resilience. Begley asks if you lose your dollar in the vending machine could ruin your morning, or your whole day. The book includes six questionnaires for six
different dimensions of emotional style to try to help people figure out where they are now and whether they want to move themselves along any of the dimensions.
You can read the full transcript here.
Take A Quiz From "The Emotional Life Of Your Brain:"
Depending on whom we are interacting with and in what circumstances, there are different rules and expectations—for interactions with close friends, people you know only slightly, family members, coworkers, or superiors. Nothing good can come of treating your boss like a child, or of treating the cop who just pulled you over like a drinking buddy, let alone treating a coworker like a lover. Sensitivity to the rules of social engagement and the capacity to regulate our emotions and behavior accordingly varies enormously among people. You can think of the Sensitivity to Context dimension of Emotional Style as the outer-directed version of the Self-Awareness style: Just as the latter reflects how attuned you are to your own physiological and emotional cues, so Sensitivity to Context reflects how attuned you are to the social environment.
In the lab, we measure this dimension by determining how emotional behavior varies with social context. For example, toddlers tend to be wary in unfamiliar circumstances such as a lab but not in a familiar environment. A toddler who seems perpetually wary at home is therefore probably insensitive to context. For adults, we test Sensitivity to Context by conducting the first round of tests in one room and then a second round in a different room. By determining to what extent emotional responses vary by the environment in which testing occurs, we can infer how keenly someone perceives and feels the effects of context. We also make brain measurements: The hippocampus appears to play an especially important role in apprehending context, so we measure hippocampal function and structure with MRI.
To get a sense of where you fall on the Sensitivity to Context spectrum, answer True or False to these questions:
-
I have been told by someone close to me that I am unusually sensitive to other people’s feelings.
-
I have occasionally been told that I behaved in a socially inappropriate way, which surprised me.
-
I have sometimes suffered a setback at work or had a falling-out with a friend because I was too chummy with a superior or too jovial when a good friend was distraught.
-
When I speak with people, they sometimes move back to increase the distance between us.
-
I often find myself censoring what I was about to say because I’ve sensed something in the situation that would make it inappropriate (e.g., before I respond to, “Honey, do these jeans make me look fat?”).
-
When I am in a public setting like a restaurant, I am especially aware of modulating how loudly I speak.
-
I have frequently been reminded when in public to avoid mentioning the names of people who might be around.
-
I am almost always aware of whether I have been someplace before, even if it is a highway that I last drove many years ago.
-
I notice when someone is acting in a way that seems out of place, such as behaving too casually at work.
-
I’ve been told by those close to me that I show good manners with strangers and in new situations.
Give yourself one point for each True answer to questions 1, 5, 6, 8, 9, and 10; score one point for each False answer to questions 2, 3, 4, and 7. Score zero for each False answer to 1, 5, 6, 8, 9, and 10, and for each True answer to 2, 3, 4, and 7. If you scored below three, you fall at the Tuned Out end of the spectrum, while a score of eight or above indicates you are very Tuned In to context.
Adapted by arrangement with Hudson Street Press, a member of Penguin Group (USA) Inc., from The Emotional Life of Your Brain by Richard J. Davidson, Ph.D., and Sharon Begley. Copyright 2012 by Richard J. Davidson, Ph.D., and Sharon Begley.


Comments
Please familiarize yourself with our Code of Conduct and Terms of Use before posting your comments.
See this article regarding workplace stress...fight or flight syndrome, etc. from Harvard Business...http://hbr.org/2008/05/the-science-of-thinking-smarter/ar/1
As a church minister for 35 years, I've often wondered why some can grow stronger in crisis and others grow bitter or broken. Will your research lead to ways for science to help those who cannot recover from loss or pain? In other words, is there hope for healing?
Diane, Richard, & Sharon,
I'm eager to read and suggest your book. I retired from 38 years teaching Middle School girls in a private school in Dallas, after living in Viet-Nam 68-70, married to an Air America pilot who was killed flying in Laos 18 Feb 70. I live with depression and PTSD and function well w/ RX & writing therapy. Presently, I volunteer at the VA Hospital in Dallas and work with veterans recovering from PTSD, brain injury, and addiction. The doctors at the VA will find your text helpful. Thanks for your work, Diane, educating the public on brain knowledge. Enjoy the journey. You're on the "write" track.
I just read Mary Wiodarski's comment/question above, and as one of these people struggling with the broken/bitter feelings after a huge life crisis... i would love to hear this addressed........ thank you very much!
I made the transition from being overly emotionally sensitive to being appropriately sensitive. Up until the age of 21 I was highly religious and very emotional.
Once I gave religion the boot I gained more solid control of my emotions. Of course, like any concussion, there was a lag time in the recovery, so it took me at least an additional decade to feel I was actually in control of myself.
Religion dealt me a 30+ year setback in living up to my potential.
Please ask about NFB therapy (Neuro-feedback)
As a clinical psychologist, it is not surprising to think that there is a neurobiological substrate for all cognitive/emotional events. Is there a danger in concretizing our subjective lives? (e.g., if there is no CURRENT way to view a subjective state of mind, it is less important or even less real?) Also, it would be helpful to address the impact of attachment histories on brain/cognitive/emotional development. Thanks, Robert Aberg
Can you comment on how recreational drug use - for example marijuana - affects emotions and the brain?
Many individuals who struggle with anxiety and depression are taking anti-depressants or anti-anxiety medication as part of their treatment. Would these medications affect the level of "plasticity" that the brain would be capable of, if an individual took up a course of mindfulness meditation?
Is the brain state (blood flow, etc) the same as the anger, for instance, or is it caused by the anger? If the latter is the case, there must be something other than the brain itself which causes its states. If so, it seems it would be the "individual", whatever that may be. If the individual can change her thinking to change their behavior or attitudes, can't we simply eliminate the examination of brain states. If it is all the brain, causing it's own states, how can anything else outside of it (eg, the "individual") change it?
We can perhaps connect both programs today!
If one goes deeper into the nature of how emotional relationships like marriage have become less successful...
As we come to understand our suseptability to emotional afflictions, and lack of flexibility...
Personal and family history, habits, and culture of our day leave us poorly educated and able to cope and make positive and lasting change in ourselves and those around us.
Emotions are in play in the body at least as much as in the brain. The word e-motion connotes that bodily feeling of movement. When we talk about health, therefore, we should consider not just "brain based" therapies but holistic therapies such as biofeedback, yoga, acupuncture, hypnotherapy, and approaches that reduce stress and promote relaxation.
If you're curious about how your own emotional type relates to health - and which of these therapies is best suited to you as an individual - I suggest going to www.youremotionaltype.com. There's plentiful information connecting one's emotional biology and emotional style with chronic illness and relief of same.
Fesspeck, you might find some answers to this question in another book on this topic - "Buddha's Brain: The practical neuroscience of happiness, love and wisdom." by Rick Hanson, PhD and Richard Mendius, MD. It desrcibes how one's mind can change their brain.
Hi Robert
Is it really necessary to 'see' our brains behavior doing it's dance for the cameras ?
The philisophical basis for these 'findings' have been the basis and practice
of Buddhism for 2500 years!
All one needs is sincere interest, the teachings, and perhaps someone to share in the learning and 'practice' of this awareness and the resultant benefits to self and acting to benefit others with compassion, kindness, understanding, etc....
Mindfulness, CBT and the like are mostly 'scientific' sub-applications derived from
or somewhat like parts of that philosophy.
I guess it makes the understanding and 'practice' of effectively dealing with confusion, suffering, and afflicting emotions -without medication- palatable for Western 'consumption'.
-a little understanding and lots of economic value!
-and a formula for the dissolution and commoditization of a very wise
and whole way of living.
Still, I'd say it's a significant improvement over the all too often confused, un-skillful, and incomplete clinical/counseling practice.
Cheers,
Robert
Thank you for a great show. I find the topic of resilience especially fascinating as my mother suffered a stroke five years ago. She no longer has the same level of resilience she once had. Her capacity to cope with adversity is limited and she becomes easily overwhelmed. I have always felt that this was due to a biological change resulting from her stroke.
Is there research showing that one can improve one's habits of thought? Years ago I realized I shared my mother's "negative perception grid." She seemed to notice things that displeased her far more than things that made her glad. I figured there are infinite "things to notice" around us all the time, far more than we CAN consciously "notice." I made an effort whenever possible to become aware of those that gave me pleasure and dwell on the others only when I NEEDED to and could take action to avert danger, solve a problem, help someone else. Over the years I have changed my habits and am a much happier person. I think many others have done this as well. Is there any research supporting this approach?
-sounds like you did the 're-search'.
Congratulations!
"The Ultra Mind Solution" by Mark Hymen may be an extraordinarily helpful book for many. Especially combined with any therapy one finds joy or relief in: meditation, cognitive therapy, art therapy, singing or music therapy, writing, gardening, etc. Inspiring online articles and websites give ideas for each. How many of us sing or hum, express ourselves with crayons, listen to calming or uplifting music every day, write down uncensored thoughts? (shredding it afterwards if it helps one write freely and a separate journal for uplifting writing.) Exercise, meditation, pulling weeds, counting breaths... All people need something available to them at any time, or between any above types of professional therapy sessions. Thank you Diane/NPR for this show and featured book.
The life of the mind, I will show you the life of the mind.
While at a wake, the funeral home handed me a card listing the 7 steps to grief. It was incredible and very helpful. It listed everything that occurs soon after or years later (or never) from a loss. Digging up the seven steps would be very useful to someone who cannot move on from one step or seems lost. Sorry that I don't have a copy. The one that struck me was anger. It is perfectly natural for a spouse to feel anger at being left behind. I did not know this originally and was very suprised when my dear mother expressed anger towards my deceased father. She had never done this prior and only later did I find that it was perfectly normal.