Consequences of Cutting Medicaid

MS. DIANE REHM

10:06:54
Thanks for joining us. I'm Diane Rehm. More than $1.3 trillion of savings in Congressman Paul Ryan's budget plan would come from Medicaid. But, so far, those plans are attracting less attention than the budget's Medicare cuts. While many Americans know Medicaid primarily serves children and the poor, fewer realize it's also the way many middle class Americans pay for long-term care.

MS. DIANE REHM

10:07:32
Joining me in the studio to talk about the consequences of cutting Medicaid, Norm Ornstein of the American Enterprise Institute, Julie Rovner of NPR, Ron Pollack of Families USA, Joy Johnson Wilson of the National Conference of State Legislatures. I hope you'll join us, 800-433-8850, your email to drshow@wamu.org. Feel free to join us on Facebook or send us a tweet. Good morning, everybody.

MR. NORMAN ORNSTEIN

10:08:18
Good morning.

MS. JULIE ROVNER

10:08:18
Good morning.

MR. RON POLLACK

10:08:18
Good morning, Diane.

MS. JOY JOHNSON WILSON

10:08:18
Good morning.

REHM

10:08:19
Norm Ornstein, talk about last week's special election in New York and what it could mean for the debate over Medicare.

ORNSTEIN

10:08:29
It was big, Diane. This is a very Republican district. Of course, it's one that was vacated because of the scandal -- a member of Congress who had to resign immediately when he went on Craigslist with a racy picture of himself. A strongly Republican district, a three-way race, but the Democrat won handily with 48 percent in that three-way race. It's hard to make an argument that was anything other than the Medicare issue, which Democrats played to the hilt. And there's been a significant backlash.

ORNSTEIN

10:09:03
I wouldn't make projections from one special election to other elections, but it's having an enormous effect inside Congress psychologically. And Republicans are nervous about what will happen with the Medicare issue. And, of course, with the debate ahead on the debt limit, a desire, I think, now on the part of Republicans to try and find some way to get a deal where they can at least move the conversation in a different direction, this is going to be a dominant issue, even more so as Democrats get heartened by that result.

REHM

10:09:36
Julie Rovner, talk about Medicaid and the misconception that some have, that it's only for the poor.

ROVNER

10:09:49
Well, you know, the Kaiser Family Foundation does this monthly tracking poll. And they came out with a poll last week, and it was -- obviously, the headline from the poll was that the public doesn't want to cut Medicaid almost as much as they don't want to cut Medicare. But one of the -- I think the most interesting finding in that poll was that more than half of the respondents said they had a personal connection to the Medicaid program.

ROVNER

10:10:10
And that was defined as having a respondent or a friend or family member having received assistance from Medicaid. That's a tremendous number of people. And I think the reason is not so much that the number of low-income children and moms, the people that we traditionally think of as being on Medicaid, but it's what you started out with. It's that long-term care component of Medicaid.

ROVNER

10:10:31
A third of the nation's nursing home bills are paid by Medicaid. Seventy percent of every person in a nursing home is being paid for with Medicaid funds. That's pretty much, you know, more than two-thirds of everybody who goes into a nursing home will end up having that nursing home stay being paid for by Medicaid. Those are middle class people who go into nursing homes and then spend down -- end up spending all of their savings. And that becomes paid for by Medicaid.

REHM

10:10:58
And, Joy Wilson, how did Medicaid become such a major player in this whole long-term care program?

WILSON

10:11:08
Well, because nursing homes are very expensive and the expense has gone up tremendously over the last 10 years. And so most families cannot afford to pay out-of-pocket for nursing home care, and Medicaid is the only public program that pays for nursing home care over the long term. Medicare pays for a very small piece, so Medicaid is the primary funder, next to out-of-pocket, for long term-term care.

REHM

10:11:40
And, Ron Pollack, you've got the average cost of a nursing home per year, $75,000. Who's got that kind of money? And do we prepare for -- do Medicaid recipients simply expect the government to cover it? What's happening?

POLLACK

10:12:02
You see, this is really a program that's helped people who all their lives were middle class. And then grandma goes to a nursing home, and, on average, it costs $75,000 a year. And you quickly impoverish yourself. You know, one of the questions you asked before, the relationship between coverage for children and coverage for people who need long-term care. One out of every six people in the Medicaid program are both participating in Medicare and in Medicaid, but they account for about half the costs in the Medicaid program.

POLLACK

10:12:42
So when we hear proposals about cutting back on Medicaid, look out grandma and look out for the family that takes care of grandma because someone is going to have to leave his or her job in order to be a caregiver to grandma if she can't stay in a nursing home.

REHM

10:12:59
Julie Rovner, how come we've heard so much about Medicare, but very few people have been talking about Medicaid?

ROVNER

10:13:10
Because Medicare, traditionally, has been a political football. We've heard this sort of Mediscare proposal that, you know, that phrase going back, really, to the mid-1990s. Medicare has been this political football that each party has used as a cudgel against the other.

ROVNER

10:13:26
The Republicans actually ended up using it quite effectively in the 2010 elections because there is $500 billion worth of reductions in the health law that passed in 2010. And they used that against the Democrats and to ride to a new House majority. And, now, I hear Democrats saying that the Ryan budget, with its cuts to Medicare, is the biggest gift that the Republicans have given to the Democrats in this Congress. And, indeed, we saw the election last week in New York as the first bit of evidence to that.

ROVNER

10:13:58
So there's -- Medicare is always used as a weapon. Seniors vote. But, again, I think seniors even don't appreciate very much how important Medicaid can be to them. Most people, when you look at the polling, don't even realize that Medicare doesn't pay for long-term care. They don't understand that. As Ron just said, you've got a lot of these, what are called, dual eligibles, people who get Medicare and Medicaid. So, often, they don't realize that they're getting both programs.

REHM

10:14:24
Norm Ornstein, when you think about Medicaid, how well does it work for the poor?

ORNSTEIN

10:14:35
It's not a great program in a lot of ways, Diane, because it's an extremely inexpensive program. But providers get paid very little, and a lot of people with -- poor people with Medicaid now are even having difficulty finding providers. But it's the safety net out there for a lot of people. The majority of births in the country occur under Medicaid. There's another component to this we haven't talked about, not just the elderly. It's also the seriously disabled.

ORNSTEIN

10:15:00
And in that number that Julie talked about, of half of people being touched, I suspect a significant number of those who have relatives who are seriously mentally disabled. And it is the safety net for people who can't get by on their own. And for families, that's extremely important. I'd make one more point, Diane. I make a prediction. This is not just about the elderly, even the issue that we've been talking about. It's their children.

ORNSTEIN

10:15:24
The Democrats are going to, at some point, have an ad that shows every 40-something's nightmare, which is mother-in-law and father-in-law arrive at the front door, you open when the doorbell rings and there they are with a suitcase in one hand and a carton of Depends in the other, saying, Medicaid won't pay for your father-in-law's nursing home anymore, and his dementia's getting worse.

ORNSTEIN

10:15:46
Get the back bedroom ready. This is where it's going to touch people. And I suspect that this is the big shoe waiting to drop, and it may have more of an impact politically in the end than Medicare.

REHM

10:15:56
Do you agree, Ron?

POLLACK

10:15:57
I do. I think there are some Republicans who feel they can cut Medicaid with impunity. They can't cut Medicare. But the reality is that Medicaid is the place where people get long-term care. And if you cut Medicaid -- that's where the dollars are, is with respect to nursing home and long-term care. So you're being consistent in terms of when you cut Medicare, and then you cut Medicaid. You're hurting seniors.

POLLACK

10:16:24
But one point, I think -- I don't want to slide over. We talk about this being a safety net program for children and families. And I think what most people don't know is that safety net for a good part of the poor -- under any circumstance would be considered poor -- is more whole than it is webbing. I'll give you some examples. For a three-person family, eligibility in Arkansas is $3,150 in annual income. In Indiana and Missouri, it's $4,633 in annual income for family of three.

POLLACK

10:17:02
In Texas, it's $4,818. In Pennsylvania, it's $6,300. All across the country, families, who, under any reasonable standards, are poor, do not qualify. And then one other thing, and that is that non-parental adults, singles and childless couples, in 42 states, you literally -- and I mean literally, not rhetorically -- literally can be penniless, and you're ineligible for Medicaid.

REHM

10:17:31
Joy, what are state legislators saying and doing about all this?

WILSON

10:17:37
I think one thing they'd say is that the program is underfinanced and that unless and until we address the financing -- the underlying financing of the program, we're not going to be able to do what the program is designed to do. I think one of the things that people have not addressed is the growing number of people with disabilities, that we save a lot of people.

WILSON

10:18:06
And we have a lot of people that have brain injuries, and we have a lot of children that have mental disabilities that are not -- they don't need nursing home care, but they need a tremendous amount of care that their parents can't afford and is not covered by insurance.

REHM

10:18:26
And the states can afford to continue...

WILSON

10:18:27
Well, and if they do, it ends up coming out of education, K through 12, higher ed, and it comes out of the criminal justice system.

REHM

10:18:39
Joy Johnson Wilson, she is with the National Conference of State Legislators. Short break. When we come back, I'll look forward to hearing from you.

REHM

10:20:03
Welcome back. We're talking this morning about Medicaid, another program, a part of the entire Medicare health system that, apparently, is going to experience huge cuts come July 1. Here in the studio, Norman Ornstein, Julie Rovner, Ron Pollack, Joy Johnson Wilson. Why is July 1 such a crucial date, Julie?

ROVNER

10:20:37
Well, the states were given extra money, actually, what they call extra matching funds to -- to start with, Medicaid is a shared expense. The federal government pays part of it. The states pay part of it. The federal government pays, actually, a little bit more than half and a lot more than half in poorer states. And in the stimulus bill that passed, when the president first took office in 2009, the states were given extra money to help them pay their burgeoning Medicaid costs.

ROVNER

10:21:02
Remember, Medicaid is what we call a countercyclical program. When the economy goes down, people lose their jobs, they get poor, more people qualify for it. So we're in that ironic place where states have less money, but they have more people on Medicaid. So the federal government gave states this extra money. Well, that expires on July 1, and it hasn't been extended. So the states have not quite recovered although we're seeing some improvement in states' revenue situations. But they're going to lose a big chunk of money on July 1.

ROVNER

10:21:29
Adding to this, we should point out, the states are required not to cut their eligibility for Medicaid because of the new health law. They have to maintain that eligibility until 2014. So the states are in kind of a world of hurt right now when it comes to Medicaid.

POLLACK

10:21:44
Well, just to give you a sense of what this means, take the State of Texas. I know you're going to have Congressman Burgess on. Right now, for every dollar spent on Medicaid in Texas, 71 cents is paid for by the federal government. Come July 1, it's going to be 61 cents. And so that's a big drop, and that doesn't even count the various proposals that are now pending in Congress. You opened up by talking about huge potential cutbacks. That's almost $1.4 trillion over the next 10 years that's part of the House Republican proposal introduced by Congressman Ryan.

POLLACK

10:22:22
And it does it in two ways. Number one, it converts Medicaid into a block grant with much diminished funding at the -- after 10 years. The cutback is about one-third of what the states would otherwise receive. That alone is going to cost the states over $770 billion in the next 10 years. The other way Congressman Ryan and the House Republicans proposed to cut Medicaid is that, in 2014, the Affordable Care Act, the health reform legislation, is designed to expand coverage.

POLLACK

10:22:58
And 100 percent of the cost of those people newly eligible will be picked up by the federal government. That will result in the states getting about $600 billion less than they otherwise would be if they allow that legislation to go into effect.

REHM

10:23:13
Okay. So here we are at a moment when the Congress is about to vote on lifting the debt ceiling. How does all of this play into it, Norm?

ORNSTEIN

10:23:28
Well, keep in mind that the public doesn't really quite grasp what the debt limit is. They think that it amounts to a family that's maxed out on its credit cards and wants to increase their credit card limit. In fact, it's paying for existing debts. But what we have is a situation where, never in our history, since we've had a debt limit have we defaulted. And if we do, we have no idea what the consequences will be in the marketplace for interest rates and otherwise.

ORNSTEIN

10:23:56
And you've got Republicans taking a very tough line, saying, not a dime in taxes, but we need to make big cuts here. And the place -- they're looking everywhere. But the place where they're looking the most is in the health care entitlements. So we've got a lot of pressure now to make very significant cuts. And as Ron said, you've got states -- Texas, just to pick one example.

ORNSTEIN

10:24:19
Gov. Perry, who's now considering a presidential bid, ran for re-election the last time, saying, look at the surplus we've had because we've had real conservative governance. Oops, $4.3 billion deficit. The deficit for the next two years appears to be $15 to $27 billion. That's without these cuts in Medicaid, and it's the 50th in states in terms of what they provide to citizens. So we've got havoc out there and the federal government looking to make that worse.

REHM

10:24:46
Do you believe that the federal government moving toward a block grant plan is going to affect state legislatures all over the country, Joy?

WILSON

10:25:00
Well, there's two ways to look at it. From some state perspective, a ceiling on what you have to do, you have your money, this is what it is, with the flexibility to decide what it is you're doing has some cache right now where we've got maintenance of effort and huge budget deficits. And they're cutting K through 12, and they know that's not a winning solution.

REHM

10:25:29
So...

WILSON

10:25:30
But on the other side, if you have a block grant and the entitlement continues, there's no way to finance that without doing great damage to the other things that states have to do outside of Medicaid. And so there's a problem.

REHM

10:25:49
It sounds as though all states are going to be caught between a rock and a hard place...

WILSON

10:25:55
And a hard place.

REHM

10:25:56
...if, in fact, they're going to get a certain amount of money from the federal government in the form of a block grant, and yet the number of recipients who are currently eligible for these benefits keeps growing. How are states going to pay for it? Are they simply going to knock people off the eligibility list?

WILSON

10:26:24
Well, they can't if they're going to stay with the program. And I think the question becomes, at what point does the requirements of the program outstrip a state's ability to pay and they decide not to participate?

POLLACK

10:26:40
You know, we're ready -- as I indicated before, the eligibility standards are miserly to begin with. I mean, where are you going to cut? We're not talking about superficial cuts here. We're talking about, really, cutting to the bone. What we need to do is understand a couple of things. First, with respect to the expansion of coverage that the Affordable Care Act establishes, all those people who will be newly eligible, that will be picked up 100 percent by the federal government from 2014 to 2016. That's very important.

POLLACK

10:27:14
Secondly, we could go back if there was the political will to do it without cutting back this matching formula that goes into effect on July 1. My hope is that state legislators and governors will express to members of Congress, particularly on the Republican side of the aisle, that this is really troublesome and work together to get this changed.

REHM

10:27:41
Here's an email from Jim, who says, "If families can't afford it, how is the government supposed to afford it? It comes out of the taxes families pay. So families end up paying for the cost in the long run."

ORNSTEIN

10:28:00
Well, you know, that's part of what you have as a societal bargain. Of course, our revenues come not just from poor and middle-class families. They come from wealthier people. They come from corporations. They come from other kinds of revenues. You've got to figure out a way that you can match your revenues to your expenditures. We have to keep in mind that we had $5.6 trillion in surpluses as we approached 2000.

ORNSTEIN

10:28:24
And then Alan Greenspan, the chairman of the Fed, was talking about what do we do if we pay down all of our debt? Why have we gone to $14 trillion in deficits that's causing this great turmoil, along with the economic downturn? The largest component is tax cuts that continue -- that have driven us into a big hole.

REHM

10:28:43
Here's another email from Peter in Tarrytown, N.Y., who says, "What are the general guidelines to qualify for Medicaid? Is it income-based only? Or does the state you live in define the income level?" Julie.

ROVNER

10:29:01
The states define the levels, and there are asset tests also. But it's defined within federal guidelines. And this is one of the things that -- why the block grant appeals to some states is that they would get more flexibility to decide about the rules, that there are federal guidelines that the states have to apply about who is eligible. And the states would have much more flexibility to decide. But, yes, you have to -- basically, what Ron was talking about is you have to fit into a certain category.

REHM

10:29:29
Right.

ROVNER

10:29:29
You have to either be a child or a pregnant woman or elderly or disabled. So if you're not in that certain category -- and that's what's going to change when the new health law takes effect in 2014 -- you would simply have to be low income in order to qualify.

REHM

10:29:46
But then there are a lot of people out there who are saying -- and certainly Republicans and Democrats, Ron, who are saying -- you got to cut spending. You just have to cut spending. Why should Medicaid be exempt?

POLLACK

10:30:04
Well, there are two different approaches to dealing with the cost of the Medicaid program. The approach that the Republicans have chosen to use is, we're going to cut people from the program. We're going to cut them by creating block grants that are not sustainable by the states, and the states are going to have to cut back. We're going to allow the states to reduce miserly eligibility standards even further. So that's one approach.

POLLACK

10:30:30
There is another approach that I'm happy that the Obama administration has adopted, and that is, let's strengthen the efficiency of the program. For example, there are a significant number of people who are eligible both for Medicare and Medicaid. Heretofore, there was no coordination between the two, and there were a lot of unnecessary expenditures because of that lack of coordination. That is being changed. Or people who may have multiple health conditions.

POLLACK

10:31:02
I mentioned the people who are eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid. Two-thirds of them have at least three chronic health conditions, and they're seeing different specialists. And one specialist doesn't know what the other specialist is doing. And so there is a lot of ways and things that are not improving the quality of care that people are receiving. As we have more coordinated care, I think we can create higher quality, and we can diminish cost.

ORNSTEIN

10:31:29
You know, one of the things we have to consider here is that if you just cut the spending, it doesn't mean you're going to save over the long run. Medicaid, to a considerable degree, is also an investment in the future. If you don't provide prenatal care to pregnant women, you're going to end up with babies that are not going to function to their full capability. It means the workforce down the road is going to be very different.

ORNSTEIN

10:31:53
The cuts that we're making in women's, infants' and children's feeding programs in Head Start have a comparable impact. And at the same time, if we look at health care cost, if people don't have insurance, we know what happens. They go to the emergency room. They do not get any preventive care. We're finding, even now, people with insurance, as their incomes go down, are not taking medications. It adds to the cost for the society of health care.

ORNSTEIN

10:32:18
And a part of the tragedy of the way we debated or didn't, the Affordable Care Act in 2009 and 2010, is it became one party against the other. No conversation about the kinds of things that Ron has been talking about, about how we can build some kind of an integrated system to reduce cost while also providing better care.

REHM

10:32:38
But, Julie, it can't just be that Republicans are all bailing us and simply don't care about what's happening to the poor or young children. I mean, how does one resolve these issues?

ROVNER

10:32:58
No. The argument and, you know, the proposal to make -- to block grant the Medicaid program goes back several decades. And it's always, you know, this is part of the devolution ideology of the Republican Party that, you know, the government that's closest to the people governs best.

ROVNER

10:33:13
And they think that Medicaid should be run by -- more by the states. That's simply what this is. To some extent, the cost saving part of this is similar to the Medicare proposal in the Ryan budget, which is that -- and it's been called by sort of nonpartisan analysts, a cost shift. Whereas the Medicare proposal would cost shift to beneficiaries, the Medicaid proposal would cost shift to the states. It would say the block grant part of it is -- could be a revenue neutral thing. If it's a...

REHM

10:33:44
And the states can handle it.

WILSON

10:33:47
Well, I think the important thing that we haven't done as a country is address what we do about long-term care financing. Having Medicaid be the only option is not going to work as you have an aging society. And, secondly, we don't have, in the Medicaid statute, a countercyclical provision. So when there's a recession, the state has to come, hat in hand, and say, please, please, please, Congress, we're in a recession, and we're -- that's not appropriate. And then Congress goes where the money is.

WILSON

10:34:21
And then Social Security, not happening. Medicare and Medicaid are the next big pots. But we have to figure out a way to control health care cost and to figure out how to finance long-term care will always be here.

REHM

10:34:36
Joy Wilson of the National Conference of State Legislators. You're listening to "The Diane Rehm Show." We're going to open the phones, 800-433-8850. Let's go first to Pensacola, Fla. Good morning, Tina. You're on the air.

TINA

10:35:00
Good morning. My 25-year-old daughter with Down syndrome is on the Medicaid waiver here in Florida. We just went through this. I'm just out here trying to work and it's paying for her to have a place to go every day. If I can't have some place for her to go, I won't be able to work. I'm paying my taxes. And, plus, this population, the disabled, they do not vote. That's all. And I'll just take my comments off the air.

REHM

10:35:22
Julie.

ROVNER

10:35:23
Medicaid is incredibly important for the disability population, including, I might add, many disabled children and adults who have insurance. Medicaid provides what are called wrap-around services that private insurance often doesn't.

ROVNER

10:35:37
There is a law that finally passed, after years and years of effort several years ago, that allows people often -- who often have private insurance to buy into Medicaid in order to get some of these wrap-around services that, as this caller points out, allows them to go to work and earn a living and pay taxes. This is something that, you know, Norm was saying, that, you know, Medicaid is often, you know, talked about as not a very well functioning program.

ROVNER

10:36:03
But there are many ways in which Medicaid functions extraordinarily well and does things that no other health program does. It may be one of the things that makes it, you know, "expensive," but it's also one of the things that makes it an amazing investment and allows, you know, for investments -- allows for people to be functioning and for the rest of their families to be functioning participants in society.

REHM

10:36:27
To Peoria, Ill., good morning, Carol.

CAROL

10:36:32
Hi. My situation is that I am a caregiver to a -- my husband has got dementia. He's on disability, which -- on Social Security disability. He has Medicare and Medicaid. As the caregiver, A, I cannot work because I got to take care of him. So I have -- when I hit 65 or 62, whatever, I will no get anything or -- because I can't -- I haven't put money in the system. And, two, in 2014, I'm worried about the private insurance I have to buy because I don't get $600 a month by taking care of him. We don't get that much money in our household.

REHM

10:37:08
Sure. Yeah, Ron Pollack.

WILSON

10:37:11
Well, Carol is a perfect example of a family that has done all the right things. They work hard, and they take care of family members. They're middle class. And then, all of a sudden, something hits where a loved one has a significant disability. And unless Medicare, Medicaid is there to help them, they're in real trouble.

REHM

10:37:33
Ron Pollack, he is executive director of Families USA. When we come back, we'll take calls from Martinsburg, Ohio, Baltimore, Md., Chapel Hill, N.C.

REHM

10:40:03
And joining us now from his office on Capitol Hill, Congressman Michael Burgess. He is Republican from Texas, chairman of the Congressional Health Care Caucus. Thank you for joining us, sir.

REP. MICHAEL BURGESS

10:40:20
Good morning, Diane. It's so great to be with you this morning.

REHM

10:40:22
Thank you. Talk about the eligibility criteria for Medicaid. Do you believe that that is fair?

BURGESS

10:40:36
Well, as you know, the law that was signed a little over a year ago, called the Affordable Care Act, kind of changed the equation with Medicaid in a big way because in -- I think, in a year-and-a-half, there will be significant, new mandatory populations that will be covered under Medicaid. And, unfortunately, as that all rolled out, there really wasn't any structural change in Medicaid itself.

BURGESS

10:41:12
You have to ask yourself, well, if you're going to have a blank sheet of paper and cover 30 million Americans who aren't covered now, is, really, the best we could do to put half of them into the Medicaid system, a Medicaid system that requires 1,300 waivers to work? I mean, the eligibility requirements for this new population are all well-established. Those are people who earned at or below 133 percent of the federal poverty level.

BURGESS

10:41:37
And I think that that has been -- there was a 5 percent sort of margin for error. So, now, it's 138 percent of the federal property level...

REHM

10:41:47
And excuse me...

BURGESS

10:41:49
...will be covered under the new Medicaid.

REHM

10:41:50
What would that be in terms of dollars? I think it's something like $4,800 for a three-person family?

BURGESS

10:41:59
Yeah, it's not generous. But, at the same time, it's a population which heretofore has never been covered at states like mine that -- in Texas, which tends to be rather minimalist as far as the covered population, children, adults with disability and women who are pregnant. Up to 150 percent of the federal poverty line are covered under Medicaid now.

REHM

10:42:24
Okay. Let me ask you, if you can give me a figure, how many Texas seniors and people with disabilities who now use Medicaid as the key funding source for nursing homes and other long-term care? How many would you estimate in Texas?

BURGESS

10:42:49
Diane, I don't know the answer to that question. But I do know this. When you talk to Dr. Berwick over at the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, he will tell you that 20 percent of his population spend 80 percent of his dollars. And he is basically talking about that population that is -- what is called the dual eligible population. They're eligible for both Medicare and Medicaid.

BURGESS

10:43:14
And those are the individual seniors who do have long-term care requirements that are being met by the Medicaid program, as Medicare itself does not really provide a long-term care benefit. So the numbers are significant. They are -- the dollar numbers that are spent are high. And, in fact, when I talked to Dr. Berwick about this, I said, why don't we get more clever about how we take care of that population?

BURGESS

10:43:43
In fact, I challenged him one time at a conference, you know, if you bought each of those individuals a concierge position to look out it -- for them and manage their care, you might find their care costs a lot less. He didn't take me up on the proposal, but it is something that I continue to look at. At some point, perhaps, we'll have it refined enough to offer a demonstration project. But you've got to have a better way to deal with the cost -- the real cost drivers in Medicaid. If you don't, it's going to consume everything.

BURGESS

10:44:17
And, you know, the real problem with Medicaid and, you know, I hate to bring this up 'cause I am a physician, but your biggest problem with Medicaid is you're not going to have doctors willing to see the patients. Because what is the easiest thing to cut in Medicaid? It's provider reimbursement. It happens all the time...

REHM

10:44:31
All right. Let me, if I may, ask you about any concerns that you might have about block grants, perhaps leading states like Texas, to throw people off the books.

BURGESS

10:44:49
Well, you know, the states are asking for it, and I think it is a legitimate ask. They're asking for a great deal more flexibility in the House. They take care of their populations. And if there's one thing we've learned from all the hearings we've done this year, the population of Massachusetts is different from the population in Texas.

REHM

10:45:09
Sure.

BURGESS

10:45:10
And what works in one state, will not work well in another. So I don't think there is a problem with giving states more flexibility. Yes, they will have accountability. They'll have accountability both to the federal agency that is responsible for administering Medicaid, and they will have direct responsibility to the populations of their state, the voters of their state.

REHM

10:45:31
But if they're...

BURGESS

10:45:33
And that is ultimately going to be the, perhaps, the bigger stick for people to carry, is if the state is not doing a good job, if, indeed, you go to a much more flexible system -- and that could include block granting -- and the state is not doing a good job of providing that care, then you will see the appropriate backlash (unintelligible)...

REHM

10:45:54
All right. But let me ask you, suppose the block grant is simply insufficient and then states have to resort to take money from other pots, for example, education, in order to cover those people who are now eligible for Medicare, Medicaid.

BURGESS

10:46:22
I think you're describing the situation as it exists today. And I know in my own state, where they were just now finishing up their two-year session and dealing with the budgetary problems, the enormous amounts of money that goes into state Medicaid does crowd out transportation. It does crowd out education. And, in fact, in Texas, we also have a modicum of border security to be concerned about that is administered by the state.

BURGESS

10:46:47
And that also is being crowded. So it is -- it's happening now. It is not something that might happen in the future. It is a very real phenomenon today, which is why...

REHM

10:46:57
All right.

BURGESS

10:46:57
...if I may, which is why we do have to look at, are there better ways to take care of the problems? Is there a better way to handle the safety net population? And can some states actually do things differently because of the unique aspects of their state?

REHM

10:47:15
And...

BURGESS

10:47:15
And that is simply the questions being asked right now.

REHM

10:47:18
So, in your view, people need to save more toward their own long-term care and rely less on government. That could be the answer for 10, 20, 30 years down the line. But what happens...

BURGESS

10:47:37
Well, I didn't say that, but that's not a bad idea. And one thing I do like to bring up whenever I have the bully pulpit is that people -- middle-class individuals who are thinking about it should seriously look into purchasing private long-term care insurance. I did myself when I turned 50, long before I ever decided to run for Congress because it is the smart and sensible thing to do.

REHM

10:48:02
But that only covers $15,000 a year. Isn't that correct?

BURGESS

10:48:06
Well, it depends on the policy that you buy. But even covering only $15,000 a year, if you're not relying on the state for that $15,000 -- I mean, again, different people have different levels of disability.

REHM

10:48:18
Sure.

BURGESS

10:48:19
Not everyone requires in-home institutional care. And that is one of the things -- one of the lessons that's been learned over the last 10 years in the Medicare -- Medicaid system. Medicaid was so inflexible that you were either institutionalized in the nursing home, or you did not go -- you did not have the benefits.

REHM

10:48:36
All right.

BURGESS

10:48:37
Well, now, with the expansion of home health agencies, while all of that requires significant oversight to ensure the proper expenditure of funds and the proper care of our senior population, it does not -- there are cheaper ways of doing things, as it turns out.

REHM

10:48:53
All right.

BURGESS

10:48:53
The one-size-fits-all program was, in fact, not doing the job that we all intended for it to do. But I would just say this, people who are able to handle the expense of a long-term care insurance policy really ought to consider doing that because there will be a time in this country where all of the benefits will cease being as generous as they are today.

REHM

10:49:16
I want...

BURGESS

10:49:16
And it's just a fact of life.

REHM

10:49:18
I want to thank you so much for joining us. Congressman Michael Burgess. He is Republican from Texas, chair of the Congressional Health Care Caucus. Thank you so much for joining us, sir.

BURGESS

10:49:35
Thank you, Diane.

REHM

10:49:35
All right. And I know, Ron Pollack, you'd like to comment.

POLLACK

10:49:40
Well, there were a number of things that you asked questions of, that Congressman Burgess slid over. First of all, the number of people in Texas who are receiving long-term care right now is over 311,000 people. Those people are in real danger if we see significant cutbacks. Now, the proposal that Congressman Burgess and his Republican colleagues voted for would wind up cutting funds to the state of Texas by $111 billion over the next 10 years. And so that does not provide a whole lot more flexibility.

POLLACK

10:50:18
He indicated that he thought that the Affordable Care Act is going to make some significant change. Well, in Texas, as I mentioned before, the eligibility for a three-person family is now $4,818 in annual income. Under the Affordable Care Act, it makes a significant improvement. It would go up to about $25,500. It's still not a huge amount of money, but at least it would provide much greater safety.

POLLACK

10:50:50
And one last thing. He lamented that there isn't adequate coordination between Medicare and Medicaid. Well, that's something that the Obama administration is fixing, and that is changed in the Affordable Care Act.

REHM

10:51:02
Joy.

WILSON

10:51:02
Just to clarify, under the existing Medicaid program, there is no real requirement for a state to cover a single childless adult that's not disabled. And so when you put their income into -- there's no -- that's zero 'cause there's no income for them. And so the big change is bringing single childless adults into the Medicaid program. That's what the Affordable Care Act does.

WILSON

10:51:34
And so, I think, it's not fair to say because the state is not covering those people. They're covering pregnant women and children maybe up to 200 percent of poverty or maybe even higher, so, you know, they're working under the current Medicaid statute. I just want to clarify.

REHM

10:51:50
Norm.

ORNSTEIN

10:51:51
You know, if we look at the struggles that states are having before they lost the stimulus money, look at Arizona, which cut out most organ transplants for Medicaid patients. And we had this bizarre case of a 29-year-old man with a wife and family, waiting for a liver transplant, finally got it approved after years of waiting. And, basically, while the liver was on ice in the ambulance heading to the hospital, they diverted it away and said, oops, sorry, you can't get this anymore.

ORNSTEIN

10:52:21
You know, we're getting death panels, actually, but they're not coming from the Affordable Care Act.

REHM

10:52:25
And now...

ORNSTEIN

10:52:25
They're coming from states who are struggling with this issue.

REHM

10:52:28
Is Arizona actually suggesting that obese people and those who smoke will not be eligible?

ROVNER

10:52:38
No. What they are suggesting is that they will have to pay $50. There will be a $50 fee for smokers and people who are obese. That's not been approved yet, but that is under consideration. They want them to kick in an extra $50 on the basis of -- apparently, there's some private insurance plans are charging extra. Many private insurance plans charge extra for smokers. So they want to add that to the Medicaid program.

ROVNER

10:53:05
Of course, the idea is if you have Medicaid, you already don't have a lot of money. So where they would come up with this $50 is unclear.

REHM

10:53:11
Julie Rovner of NPR. And you're listening to "The Diane Rehm Show." Let's go to Duncanville, Texas. Good morning, Jim. You're on the air.

JIM

10:53:24
Good morning, Diane. What seems to be coming across in a lot of discussion this morning is the mean-spiritedness of cutting the Medicare and Medicaid money. And the other side of this is the people who say, hey, we don't have money, we need to cut things, and things like that. So there's a contrast there. And what I'm anxious, you know, the Republicans and the Democrats oscillate in getting elected on those two arguments.

JIM

10:53:56
What I'm waiting for is somebody who will say, hey, here is what we need to spend, and here is how we're going to pay for it, even if it means additional taxes.

REHM

10:54:05
Julie Rovner.

ROVNER

10:54:07
Well, I think what everybody is looking for is a way to bring down health care costs, which is, of course, what, you know, we're all sort of nibbling around the edges.

REHM

10:54:13
But we've been trying to do that since Califano.

ROVNER

10:54:17
Yes. We -- that is, in fact, true. We have been trying to do this since before that, I mean, really, since the 1960s, which is when they really started going up. And everybody has different ways of doing it. I mean, one of the ironies is that what Congressman Burgess was just talking about, some of the ideas about getting, you know, ways to better coordinate care for people who are dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid, who are among the most expensive patients in the entire health care system, are in the Affordable Care Act that he is working very hard to repeal.

ROVNER

10:54:47
They are the beginnings of ways to -- that people hope will start to, as they say, bend the cost curve. But nobody really knows how to do that. And in the meantime, you know, costs keep going up, and they are affecting Medicare and Medicaid and private insurance.

ORNSTEIN

10:55:01
You know, Diane, the great tragedy here is that we are in a partisan era where what matters is not the message but the messenger. And so the Affordable Care Act includes virtually every proposal that nonpartisan and ideological figures who have worked in the health policy vineyards for decades have come up with. That includes, by the way, this independent panel to try and look at ways to change Medicare, which was not a democratic or liberal ideal in the past.

ORNSTEIN

10:55:29
But because it was proposed by Obama and Democrats, you got a knee-jerk reaction. And we're getting the same, I think, just in terms of the overall dialogue, and it's taking us away from having a rational discussion. Republicans now are talking about -- and conservatives' Michael Gerson in The Post today -- you can't have bureaucrats or others doing this. It's been done by politicians.

ORNSTEIN

10:55:50
And what politicians have done is to respond to pressure from seniors and, basically, not found good ways of moving the fee-for-service issue off the table.

REHM

10:55:58
Is the only way to satisfy everybody in this argument -- is it to raise taxes?

POLLACK

10:56:10
Well, that's got to be a part of a balanced approach. And no one is saying that raising taxes is the only piece of the equation. But, right now, you've got -- some will say taxes are totally off the table.

REHM

10:56:22
Off the table.

POLLACK

10:56:24
And you can't solve our deficit problems just on cutting programs. And when it comes to health care, we can do a better job in coordinating care, paying for quality of services rather than quantity of services. There are some ways that we can get costs down without hurting the people who depend on these programs for their lifeline.

REHM

10:56:48
Ron Pollack of Families USA. Joy Johnson Wilson, she is with the National Conference of State Legislatures. Julie Rovner of NPR. Norm Ornstein of the American Enterprise Institute. Thank you all so much.

POLLACK

10:57:09
Thank you, Diane.

ROVNER

10:57:09
Thank you.

REHM

10:57:10
Thanks for listening. I'm Diane Rehm.

ANNOUNCER

10:57:12
"The Diane Rehm Show" is produced by Sandra Pinkard, Nancy Robertson, Susan Nabors, Denise Couture, Monique Nazareth and Sarah Ashworth. The engineer is Erin Stamper. Dorie Anisman answers the phones. Visit drshow.org for audio archives, transcripts, podcasts and CD sales. Call 202-885-1200 for more information.
Transcripts of WAMU programs are available for personal use. Transcripts are provided "As Is" without warranties of any kind, either express or implied. WAMU does not warrant that the transcript is error-free. For all WAMU programs, the broadcast audio should be considered the authoritative version. Transcripts are owned by WAMU 88.5 FM American University Radio and are protected by laws in both the United States and international law. You may not sell or modify transcripts or reproduce, display, distribute, or otherwise use the transcript, in whole or in part, in any way for any public or commercial purpose without the express written permission of WAMU. All requests for uses beyond personal and noncommercial use should be referred to (202) 885-1200.

Our address has changed!

The Diane Rehm Show is produced by member-supported WAMU 88.5 in Washington DC.