Friday News Roundup - Hour 1
http://thedianerehmshow.org/shows/2011-02-11/friday-news-roundup-hour-1
House Republicans propose deep spending cuts. Fed Chief Bernanke faces questions about inflation. And the week brought surprise announcements from members of Congress. A panel of journalists joins Diane for analysis of the week's top national news stories.
Guests
David Welna
congressional correspondent, NPR.
Lynn Sweet
Washington bureau chief, Chicago Sun-Times, and columnist at politicsdaily.com.
John King
anchor of CNN's John King, USA, and chief national correspondent.

Comments
Please familiarize yourself with our Code of Conduct and Terms of Use before posting your comments.
PART TWO
As for it being “too early to tell” about Obama - funny, you’ve done a very good job so far of condemning him almost constantly. (And please, don’t demean the Constitution by pretending your views have anything to do with it.)
“But for Fanny and Freddie, mortgage brokers, and yes, banks would never have had a place to dump their loans.”
Thanks for proving my point: Fanny and Freddie didn’t create those loans. Oh, and by the way, neither were all the loans “dumped” on Fanny and Freddie. (In fact, had that been true the mess could have been contained, and we could have just let the “macs” go bust.) In case you forgot, AIG wasn’t insuring Fanny and Freddie, but the private banks that were busy “swapping” their credit defaults.
“Repealing Glass-Steagall . . . made the mortgage market awash in money.”
Listen carefully. I'm only going to say this one time: BALONEY!. What that did was enable investment banks (which normally engage in stock and other riskier transactions, etc.) to enter the mortgage market without regulation. That’s why they were able to make such risky loans. In addition, the exception put into the Commodity Futures Trading Act (courtesy of Phil Gramm) left those “new” financial instruments (CDO’s and derivatives) completely unregulated. You keep ignoring those critical points
Which is why I can’t agree with your “solutions”. (Well, I agree with bringing back Glass-Steagall. But that doesn’t “protect depositors money”. The FDIC does that - another “big government” program I guess you’d want to do away with).
TO BE CONTINUED
PART THREE
(By the way, it was only part of Glass-Steagall that was repealed. Actually, the FDIC was originally created by another part of it.)
Sorry, but expecting the “pure, perfect, sacred, and holy” free market to solve all our problems is nonsense. It was too much “free marketing” that helped create this mess.